Science Vs Religion
If someone were to ask me whether science and religion can
coexist, my answer would be: ‘it does.’
Religion has always explored the realm of life in which we
don’t know the answers – the things that touch us in ways that we find it hard
to describe scientifically. I’m talking about creativity, compassion, paternal
love, intimacy, evil. I could list more. There’s something extremely human
about religion. We’re constantly overwhelmed by our emotions and it’s not easy
for us to think rationally. After all, our intelligence is limited.
Science, on the other hand, is not a religion. It’s a nice
process for us humans to get to the bottom of things about the universe. As
discussed in my post about the scientific method, science can only approach ideas
that can be falsified. God’s existence is not, and never will be, one of these
ideas.
So, by definition, religion always lies outside the scope of
science. However, this doesn’t mean that they never cross paths. A famous
example is the Renaissance. Since I’ve been living in Florence, Italy, I’ve had
the opportunity to learn a whole lot more about this period of history. At my
current understanding (I’m not an historian), the Renaissance is one of the
biggest Science vs Religion battles to date. There are many people and stories
within this battle. One of my favourites is Galileo Galilei, an important
player in the founding of the scientific method.
In brief, Galileo had a run in with the Pope because some of
his scientific discoveries, and his general approach to finding truth, were contradictory
to the ‘truths’ upheld in Roman Catholic Christianity at the time. He was
eventually arrested for challenging these ‘truths’ and he died under house
arrest.
![]() |
I now live near Galileo's house! |
Despite Galileo’s short-term loss against the church, the
Renaissance ultimately resulted in a big reshuffling of the authority of
religion in the scientific realm. To quote history.com, “While the exact timing
and overall impact of the Renaissance is sometimes debated, there’s little
dispute that the events of the period ultimately led to advances that changed
the way people understood and interpreted the world around them.”
Yet, the warring continues. The notion that the Bible holds
scientific truths is still widely upheld in Christian communities today. During
my Christian schooling, I never learnt about natural selection and many of my teachers
openly opposed sound scientific theories as contradictory to scripture. Once I
learnt about these ideas properly, I felt overwhelmingly betrayed.
I’ll go out with a quote accredited to Galileo: “I do not feel obliged to believe that the same
God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to
forgo their use.”
Comments
Post a Comment